1)
What was the biggest surprise for you in the
reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different
from your expectations?
I think the biggest surprise to me was the premise and theme
of the whole article. I was not aware that microfinance companies existed. I
would think that a business with profit margins that are that low would not attract
investors or would not stay in business for that long.
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that
was confusing to you.
I was a little confused about the structure of the
microfinance firm. I am not sure how the loan officers work and whether they
worked independently at home or if they worked at the local branch. It is not necessarily
important I guess but it does intrigue me because of the firm’s expansion rate.
3)
If you were able to ask two questions to the
author, what would you ask? Why?
I would ask them what he thinks the biggest roadblock is for
these impoverished families who want to better their lives. I would also ask
the author what he thinks is the most important about the microfinance
business.
4)
Was there anything you think the author was
wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
I don’t think this article necessarily held any strong
positions or opinions. It was mostly a narrative of the impact and experiences
of the microfinance firm. So I don’t disagree with anything.
