1)
What was the biggest surprise for you in the
reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different
from your expectations?
-I did not expect the article to talk about how
nondemographic segmentation can be just as bad or useless to corporate decision
makers as demographic segmentation. I thought nondemographic segmentation would
be able to give the decision makers details and information about consumers
that demographics information cannot, and therefore it is always more useful.
2)
Identify at least one part of the reading that
was confusing to you.
-I didn’t quite understand the foundation for how the author
distinguishes or separates a shallow decision from a deep one.
3)
If you were able to ask two questions to the
author, what would you ask? Why?
-I would ask the author what the best nonmarket segmentation
is and why. I would also ask him how he thinks market segmentation will evolve
with the use of social media in the future.
4)
Was there anything you think the author was
wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
-I didn’t find anything that I disagree with, but I did find
the article and his views very interesting. I do wonder how his opinions and
ideas have changed the emergence and dominance of different social media
platforms.
No comments:
Post a Comment